It’s Not About the Building…

Above – Yup, that works for me.

Without wanting to architects a disservice, we’re rather too fixated on the building. I’m realising, though, that in the important issues we face today – the development of our towns and cities – buildings are far less important than the spaces between. It sounds obvious when you say it, of course, but it’s still a point that many people seem not to realise.

In the criticism of the ubiquitous British developer housing, most people focus on how bad the buildings are. I’m not disputing for a minute that the buildings are anything other than appalling, cynical and lazy, but the main issue is one of site layout.

What I mean by this is that if you took the terrible architecture of the average British estate and rearranged it intelligently into a format where buildings formed street frontages, where the wasted space was removed, where the driveways were removed, where the spaces between buildings where reduced, where street widths were reduced, where blocks were formed with definition and hierarchy and corners contained shops and pubs, and there was a finer grain of pedestrian access across the area – you’d pretty much have the perfect place.

You could still have the terrible trappings of lazy developerdom – the pvc windows, the nasty brick and the horrible interlocking roof tiles – and it would be fine. All this, of course used to be second nature to us – as it’s pretty much the fabric of most towns across the UK, but it’s now a formula that alludes most house builders and developers. Are they just too stupid, too greedy, to lazy or just too conservative to think differently?

Categories Articles

One Comment

  1. Ross
    Posted September 27, 2013 at 12:32 pm | Permalink

    I cannot agree more with your post!

    However, I don’t know if all of the blame lies with the developer. Surely if they wanted to cram people into a space, which would be exponentially more profitable, they would retain a classier dressed up version of the ‘back to back’ housing that we can see in Victorian and Edwardian architecture.

    I think it is partly the fault of the buyer for purchasing in these hellish mazes. People today no longer want to share the street with 20 other houses, they want their own separate dwelling, or at the very least a semi. I believe that it is their fault that the housing situation is like it is. As home owners we have to demand that a change be made in the way our homes are designed, and the only way to do this is to hold out for quality. Unfortunately with government funding it seems the only way forward is the all too familiar ‘Barrett Home’.

    It would just take a few architectural practices to look back at the utopian visions of gardens cities and mould their modern housing estate to match more similarly.

Leave a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>